Why can't romance novels cut out all the b.s. and be more realistic?


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2009 October
2009 May
2009 April
2009 February
2009 January
2008 November
2008 October
2008 September
2008 July
2008 June
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 February
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 March
2005 November
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July

My Links
My Humorous Buzzle Articles
My Freelance Writing Website
Tripology
My How-To Articles On E-How.com

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


Provided by AssociatedContent.com - The People's Media Company

Why can't romance novels cut out all the b.s. and be more realistic?
11.30.07 (5:08 pm)   [edit]
"Why is the language in a romance novel so lame?  For example..."
"Looking at them made him weak.  Her lips were full and lush just begging to be kissed."
"I would just love it if a romance novel would be more realistic and say..."
"She wore beer-flavored lip gloss on her big-ass lips because she knew that there wasn't a red-blooded male on earth that woul d pass up a free beer and a little nookie on the side from a good-lookin' chick."
"I mean, keep it real!"
"I get so tired of reading romance novels with passages like..."
"It was simply divine. Her womanhood tasted of pungent crushed flowers and dew."
"BORING!"
"Why can't they keep it real and say..."
"Her woo-ha tasted wicked nasty as a result of a lingering yeast infection and a
burrito-fueled bowel movement."

"I'll never understand why romance novels can't cut out all the b.s. and be more realistic."
 


posted by: froggie (reply)
post date: 11.30.07 (7:38 pm)

Amen! That's why I have NEVER read one.

Your Name:


Your Comment: